Public statementsYes |
New Zealand First’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “The use of 1080 to control predators and pests isn't working and New Zealand First will work to stop it being used without compr...” ‐co.nz
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Yes, and aggressively pursue alternative methods
New Zealand First has been vocal about their opposition to the use of 1080 and have advocated for the use of alternatives. This suggests that they would strongly agree with a ban on 1080 and the aggressive pursuit of alternative methods. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
New Zealand First has been vocal about their opposition to the use of 1080, a poison used for pest control. They have called for a halt to aerial 1080 drops and have advocated for the use of alternatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but there should be more restrictions on its use
While New Zealand First has called for a halt to aerial 1080 drops, they have also advocated for the use of alternatives. This suggests that they may be open to more restrictions on its use, rather than a complete ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given their opposition to the use of 1080, it is unlikely that New Zealand First would disagree with a ban on its use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, it is the best solution we currently have
New Zealand First has been critical of the use of 1080, suggesting that they do not view it as the best solution for pest control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to New Zealand First’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.