Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?

Test on criminals such as rapists and murderers.

Yes, but only if there is no other alternative

If they can do this without using animals it would be preferable but if that is the only option then yes

Use of testing on people who are convicted of sexual assault and murder, not manslaughter, but murder

Regulations need to be rigorous and reviewed that the new product has a legitimate chance of causing harm and whether existing tests for similar products are sufficient. I don't agree for cosmetics

In some cases yes but always make sure the animals don’t suffer

if its a sheep or a cow

No they should use criminal offenders such as rapists and murderers

Don't have any stance on this

Depends on the drug

Yes, but only where there are no other testing alternatives and the product is considered life saving

Yes but there should be rules on how this happens. No cosmetics for example and the tests shouldn’t cause pain

Medical life changing chemicals after all other avenues have been researched

Depends on the impact the testing has on animals

Test pedophiles

Test it on Rapists and Murderers

Only if there is no other more animal friendly way and strict humane methods applied

No find another way or don’t use substances that are harmful

Yes, but only for testing products to be used on animals

Only humans who are imprisoned as part of their sentence which include heinous crimes like rape and murder should receive this by force.

Use humans. We are animals. And to be quite frank it's not ok to force our wants on any other species to benefit us and us alone. It's really messed up.

Yes, but only for life saving drugs

Yes on all medical advances, however in the most humane way possible

Yes, but only if they are treated humanely and do not suffer.

Yes, but not repeatedly. Once you get the scientific result the animal should nevet have to suffer for those results again needlessly.

Test on convicted child sex offenders.

It depends on what animals are used.

Use criminals who are convicted behind a doubt of serious crimes ie murder/rape

Drugs, medical devices, and vaccines as long as they would be happy giving it to a human. Don't actually give it to a human, test on the animal, but don't give it to the animal if you are not 100% happy with it

No, rather test it on prisoners serving a life sentence for murder or rape.

maybe like sickly dying animals or pests or ones that aren’t so conscious

Test it on pedos sex offenders

As long as ethics proposals have been reviewed and accepted

Shouldn't you are ready know what is harmful without kill animals

Yes. Depends what ones

It's an awful thought either way, I just cant answer this as there is repercussions and moral issues either side

use prisioners to test on.

Yes if it’s relevant to siad animal (not for human gain)

Only certain animals which have smaller brain capacities

if done ethically yes, otherwise no

yes, as long as humane

How else would they test? They could test it on the politicians!

So long as it is not on domestic animals

What is the alternative? I don't like the idea of animals being used for testing.

yes but this means not killing a thousand animals

No, animals are to be let out and roam freely and not held against their will.

Only with due regards to the health and safety of the animals

If you won’t try it on yourself why would you try it on a poor defenceless furbaby

no, test it on very bad criminals