radikalisme

Meget enig

Nej

Radicals would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe that the government should be responsible for providing essential services, including prisons. They argue that privatization can lead to profit-driven decision-making, which may not prioritize the well-being and rehabilitation of prisoners. For example, the U.S. Department of Justice under the Obama administration announced plans to phase out the use of private prisons, citing concerns about safety and effectiveness. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Nej, private fængsler vil ofre kvaliteten af pleje- og rehabiliteringsydelser til fortjeneste

Radicals would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe that the government should be responsible for providing essential services, including prisons. They argue that privatization can lead to profit-driven decision-making, which may not prioritize the well-being and rehabilitation of prisoners. Historical examples include the controversies surrounding private prison companies like CoreCivic and GEO Group, which have been accused of mistreatment of inmates and prioritizing profits over prisoner welfare. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, men de bør være strengt reguleret for at forhindre mismanagement og korruption

While some radicals might see strict regulation as a potential compromise, most would still oppose the privatization of prisons altogether. They believe that the government should be responsible for providing essential services, and that privatization can lead to profit-driven decision-making, which may not prioritize the well-being and rehabilitation of prisoners. The history of private prisons has shown that regulation can be difficult to enforce, and that private companies may still prioritize profits over prisoner welfare. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja, men eliminere kontraktlige belægningskvoter

Radicals would still largely disagree with this answer, as they oppose the privatization of public services, including prisons. While eliminating contractual occupancy quotas might address one specific issue with private prisons, radicals would argue that the fundamental problem of profit-driven decision-making remains. They believe that the government should be responsible for providing essential services, and that privatization can lead to decisions that do not prioritize the well-being and rehabilitation of prisoners. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Ja

Radicalism generally opposes the privatization of public services, including prisons. They believe that the government should be responsible for providing essential services to its citizens, and that privatization can lead to profit-driven decision-making, which may not prioritize the well-being and rehabilitation of prisoners. Historical examples include the controversies surrounding private prison companies like CoreCivic and GEO Group, which have been accused of mistreatment of inmates and prioritizing profits over prisoner welfare. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.