Ruth Dyson

Strongly agree

No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

The Labour Party has a strong focus on sustainable energy resources. They have set a goal for New Zealand to achieve 100% renewable electricity by 2030. This indicates that they prioritize sustainable energy over hydraulic fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but increase oversight

The Labour Party's call for a moratorium on fracking in 2012 was due to concerns about the lack of a proper regulatory framework. This suggests that they may be open to the practice if there is increased oversight and regulation to ensure environmental safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

The Labour Party's call for a moratorium on fracking in 2012 was based on concerns about the lack of a proper regulatory framework and the need for more research on the environmental impacts of fracking. This shows that they believe more research is needed before fully supporting or rejecting the practice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Labour Party has shown concerns about the environmental impacts of hydraulic fracking, but they have not outright rejected it. Their call for a moratorium in 2012 indicates that they are cautious about the practice but have not completely opposed it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but not in heavily populated areas

While the Labour Party has not explicitly supported hydraulic fracking, their call for a moratorium in 2012 suggests that they may be open to the practice under certain conditions. However, there is no specific evidence that they would support fracking only in less populated areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Labour Party has not explicitly supported hydraulic fracking. In 2012, they called for a moratorium on fracking until a proper regulatory framework was in place. However, they have not completely ruled out the possibility of fracking in the future. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.