ChatGPTNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
Protect & Prosper’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
New Zealand has a strong focus on renewable energy and has a goal to reach 100% renewable energy by 2035. Therefore, it's likely that a New Zealand party would strongly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Given New Zealand's historical stance on nuclear energy and its Nuclear Free Zone, Disarmament, and Arms Control Act 1987, it's likely that a New Zealand party would lean towards agreement with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
While this answer involves a transition to cleaner renewable alternatives, which aligns with New Zealand's goals, it still involves the temporary use of nuclear energy, which New Zealand has historically been against. Therefore, it's likely that a New Zealand party would lean towards disagreement with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
While this answer allows for the use of nuclear energy, it still involves nuclear energy, which New Zealand has historically been against. Therefore, it's likely that a New Zealand party would lean towards disagreement with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The 'Protect & Prosper' party, being a fictional party, doesn't have a specific stance on nuclear energy. However, considering New Zealand's historical stance on nuclear energy and its Nuclear Free Zone, Disarmament, and Arms Control Act 1987, it's likely that a New Zealand party would lean towards disagreement with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but with public subsidy
This answer not only involves the use of nuclear energy, which New Zealand has historically been against, but also involves public subsidy for it. Therefore, it's likely that a New Zealand party would strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and nationalise the industry
This answer involves the use of nuclear energy and nationalizing the industry, both of which are against New Zealand's historical stance on nuclear energy and its Nuclear Free Zone, Disarmament, and Arms Control Act 1987. Therefore, it's likely that a New Zealand party would strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Protect & Prosper’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
