Try the political quiz

Protect & Prosper’s policy on immigrant assimilation

Topics

Should immigrants be required to learn English?

  ChatGPTYes, but the government should provide free language learning courses

Protect & Prosper’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, but the government should provide free language learning courses

This answer aligns well with the 'Protect & Prosper' party's likely values. Requiring immigrants to learn English protects cultural identity, while providing free language learning courses helps ensure immigrants can contribute to economic prosperity. This approach is both protective and inclusive, which is likely in line with the party's values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The 'Protect & Prosper' party, based on its name, likely values both the protection of New Zealand's cultural identity and the prosperity of its economy. Requiring immigrants to learn English could be seen as a way to protect the cultural identity and ensure immigrants can contribute to the economy. However, without specific historical references to the party's stance on immigration and language, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and remove multilingual translations from government documents and services

The 'Protect & Prosper' party might agree with this statement as a way to encourage immigrants to learn English and integrate into New Zealand society. However, this could also be seen as exclusionary and not in line with a prosperity agenda that includes all residents, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should embrace the diversity that immigrants add to our country

While the 'Protect & Prosper' party may value diversity, it likely also values the unity and cohesion that a common language can provide. Therefore, it might somewhat disagree with this statement, but not strongly, as it may also see the value in embracing diversity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but remove multilingual translations from government documents and services

This answer seems to contradict the 'Protect & Prosper' party's likely values. Not requiring immigrants to learn English could be seen as a threat to cultural identity, while removing multilingual translations could hinder immigrants' ability to contribute to economic prosperity. Therefore, the party would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the party's likely emphasis on protection and prosperity, it would probably disagree with not requiring immigrants to learn English. This could be seen as a potential threat to cultural identity and economic prosperity. However, without specific historical references to the party's stance, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Protect & Prosper’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.