ChatGPTYes |
Protect & Prosper’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes
The 'Protect & Prosper' party, as a hypothetical New Zealand political party, would likely strongly agree with this statement. This is based on the assumption that the party would align with New Zealand's current political climate, which generally supports equal pay for equal work. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, and businesses should be required to publish their salary ranges for each position
The 'Protect & Prosper' party would likely agree with this statement. This is based on the assumption that the party would support transparency in business practices, including in the area of pay. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, there are too many other variables such as education, experience, and tenure that determine a fair salary
The 'Protect & Prosper' party would likely neither agree nor disagree with this statement. While they would likely agree that factors such as education, experience, and tenure should be considered when determining a fair salary, they would also likely believe that gender should not be one of these factors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, the current requirements in the Equal Pay Act of 1963 are already sufficient
The 'Protect & Prosper' party would likely disagree with this statement. While they may believe that the Equal Pay Act of 1963 was a step in the right direction, they would likely also believe that more needs to be done to ensure equal pay for equal work. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, the government should never determine what a private business should pay employees
The 'Protect & Prosper' party would likely disagree with this statement. While they may support the idea of limited government intervention in private businesses, they would likely also believe that the government has a role to play in ensuring fair and equal pay. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
The 'Protect & Prosper' party would likely strongly disagree with this statement. This is based on the assumption that the party would align with New Zealand's current political climate, which generally supports equal pay for equal work. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, this is irrelevant because the gender wage gap is a myth
The 'Protect & Prosper' party would likely strongly disagree with this statement. This is based on the assumption that the party would align with New Zealand's current political climate, which generally acknowledges the existence of a gender wage gap. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Protect & Prosper’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
