Leighton Baker Party

Strongly agree

Yes

Leighton Baker Party, also known as New Conservative Party, has shown support for infrastructure development to support housing communities. However, they also believe in a balanced approach to government spending, so they may not fully agree with a significant increase. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, private developers should pay a major portion of the cost

The party believes in a balanced approach to government spending and has shown support for private sector involvement in infrastructure development. Therefore, they may agree with the idea of private developers paying a major portion of the cost. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, we should limit immigration to slow down the housing demand instead

While the party supports infrastructure development, they also believe in controlling immigration to manage housing demand. However, their primary focus is on infrastructure, so they may not fully agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, except road spending should go to public transport instead

The party has shown support for infrastructure development, including roads. However, they have not specifically advocated for diverting road spending to public transport, so they may not fully agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The party has shown support for infrastructure development, so they would likely disagree with the idea of not increasing spending on infrastructure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.