It should not be anyone's decision to decide what a woman does with her body, if a woman personally disagrees with abortion then she is entitled to keep any child but some women for a myriad of reasons cannot and should not have a baby and it should be no ones decision but her own to decide that.
@CruelPaella8mos8MO
I believe it's not just about the woman's body, but also about the unborn child's life.
Take, for example, a situation I came across once. A close friend found herself unexpectedly pregnant and considered abortion due to her circumstances. But she chose to carry the pregnancy to term and gave the child up for adoption. Today, that child has grown up in a loving family and has a chance at life.
I suppose my question is, shouldn't the potential life of the unborn child factor into this decision? If we advocate for the rights of the woman, are we not also duty-bound to consider the rights of the unborn? I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.
@9G5FV9J8mos8MO
Difficult to debate this, as there are more factors involved in that decision, not only women rights, life should always prevailed, but there could be some circumstances that allow some of them to terminate their pregnancy (ie someone that was raped). If you only base your decision on women's rights, it will bring 300 thousand other rights from people that only want to take an advantage of them.
@9G5FR3N 8mos8MO
Any decision regarding the health and wellbeing of a woman should be between them and their qualified physician.
The historical activity of users engaging with this disagreement.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
