Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsCriminal IssuesNew Zealand politicsCriminal JusticeJudicial DiscretionThree Strikes LawMandatory Sentencing•••Started 3mos agoActive 4wks ago

Should judges be required to impose maximum sentences on repeat serious offenders?

The "Three Strikes" law mandates maximum penalties without parole for repeat violent or sexual offenders. Although repealed in 2022, the current New Zealand government plans to reintroduce it to deter serious crime. Proponents argue it is necessary to prioritize victim safety and remove dangerous offenders from society. Opponents claim it strips judges of discretion, fails to lower crime rates, and disproportionately incarcerates Māori.

Answer Overview

Response rates from 213 New Zealand voters.

80%
Yes
20%
No
74%
Yes
14%
No
3%
Yes, keep dangerous career criminals off the streets
2%
No, judges need discretion to ensure the punishment fits the crime
3%
Yes, mandatory sentencing ensures victims receive justice
2%
No, it is an expensive failure that does not reduce crime rates
2%
No, this policy disproportionately targets Māori and ignores root causes

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 213 New Zealand voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 213 New Zealand voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from New Zealand voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @BD5FQLWanswered…4wks4W

No, because a judge must be able to fit the context of the crime. That said, there are too many arguing that socio-economic level (or worse, race) excuses poor behavior - this is an offense to the rest of us poor people who *don't commit these crimes*.

 @BD2GT8Nanswered…1mo1MO

judges intuition should be trusted

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.