Self-hosted digital wallets are personal, user-managed storage solutions for digital currencies like Bitcoin, which provide individuals with control over their funds without relying on third-party institutions. Monitoring refers to the government having the capability to oversee transactions without the ability to directly control or interfere with the funds. Proponents argue that it ensures personal financial freedom and security while allowing the government to monitor for illegal activities such as money laundering and terrorism financing. Opponents argue that even monitoring infringes on privacy rights and that self-hosted wallets should remain completely private and free from government oversight.
65% Yes |
35% No |
61% Yes |
26% No |
3% Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions |
10% No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies |
See how support for each position on “Self Hosted Digital Wallets” has changed over time for 31 New Zealand voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Self Hosted Digital Wallets” has changed over time for 31 New Zealand voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from New Zealand users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
Explore other questions that New Zealand voters are discussing.
