+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 859 1010 voters.

24%
Yes
76%
No
22%
Yes
63%
No
1%
Yes, make the liability proportional to the expected yearly income of the degree offered
5%
No, it is the student’s responsibility to manage their financial outcome
1%
Yes, but only if they are for profit universities
5%
No, we should instead focus on decreasing the cost of education
3%
No, and higher education should be free for everyone

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 859 1010 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 859 1010 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from 1010 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9RWHKMKanswered…4mos4MO

No, and this is an absurd question. Someone graduates and then can't be bothered paying their loan... why would anyone believe the university is liable? This seems to be valuing education only so far as it helps get a job. This is absurd.

 @9HK9YD6 answered…12mos12MO

The legs wings policy by the loans and fruad support against the ages by the right wings dramatic legend former US president Donald Trump and former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson talking white House issued

 @9G3Z2RGanswered…1yr1Y

University’s could be required to cap the amount of students who can enroll in a degree program if there is a record of students not getting work in that field.

 @9G2JTMDanswered…1yr1Y

Universities have a responsibility to align graduate numbers in each field more closely to workforce needs

 @9FZVQD5answered…1yr1Y

Universities should be harder to attend and get in. On the job based training should be supported more. Money spent on supporting new employees in their career.

 @9FP4W4Wanswered…1yr1Y

 @9FQHDM4from Connecticut  answered…1yr1Y

I think there needs to be some accountability to motivate a student but I think costs are so high that it makes it very hard for any student to get a head start in life with a student loan.