53% Yes |
47% No |
38% Yes |
47% No |
12% Yes, but require the labelling of foods that are genetically modified |
|
3% Yes, but producers should not be able to patent seeds |
See how support for each position on “Genetically Modified Foods” has changed over time for 131k New Zealand voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Genetically Modified Foods” has changed over time for 131k New Zealand voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from New Zealand users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9F9DVTX 7mos7MO
Depends on the application, if it makes the plant inherently less susceptible to disease then I support it. If the purpose of the modification is to make it more resistant to pesticides then I disagree.
@9G72CG9 6mos6MO
Yes but not be able to patent seeds and require the lableling of foods that are genetically modified
@9G6PC5G 6mos6MO
Yes, however more research should be done about the harmful effects. So far the concerns are allergies, cancer and environmental issues.
@9G28S7D6mos6MO
Yes but only if they are ethically distributed and grown and all foods are labelled and seeds are not patented.
@9G22BFS6mos6MO
I think gene modification plant to plant is good, but animal genes in plants is bad and should be labeled
@9FY6S4K6mos6MO
Only if full research done to check food is safe for consumption and nutritional value is not reduced
Explore other topics that are important to New Zealand voters.
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
High density housing refers to housing developments with a higher population density than average. For example, high rise apartments are considered high density, especially in comparison to single-family homes or condominiums. High density real estate can also be developed from empty or abandoned buildings.…
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)