Fracking is the process of extracting oil or natural gas from shale rock. Water, sand and chemicals are injected into the rock at high pressure which fractures the rock and allows the oil or gas to flow out to a well. While fracking has significantly boosted oil production, there are environmental concerns that the process is contaminating groundwater.
28% Yes |
72% No |
23% Yes |
59% No |
3% Yes, but increase oversight |
8% No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead |
2% Yes, but not in heavily populated areas |
5% No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking |
See how support for each position on “Fracking” has changed over time for 337k New Zealand voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Fracking” has changed over time for 337k New Zealand voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from New Zealand users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9FYBN8W6mos6MO
It's far too complicated for one question - until sustainable energy can cover the flex in our energy demands and until the rest of our system is set up to support fully green energy. We can't do without unfortunately.
@9DC5V878mos8MO
I don’t understand this enough to make a decision
@8CS3Z5Y4yrs4Y
Only for public transport and emergency cars. Like ambulance, police cars, fire trucks ect
@9G6ZGZV6mos6MO
Yes but only because it would leave a lot of people unemployed. Alternatives should be introduced and cheap.
@9FYQ78P6mos6MO
No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead That is affordable for low income as well so its accessible to everyone
@9FSJV987mos7MO
Yes for now to avoid importing from overseas, but work on a more sustainable energy resource for the long run
Explore other topics that are important to New Zealand voters.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
The United Nations defines human rights violations as deprivation of life; torture, cruel or degrading treatment or punishment; slavery and forced labor; arbitrary arrest or detention; arbitrary interference with privacy; war propaganda; discrimination; and advocacy of racial or religious hatred. In…
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry.…