The Opportunities Party supports evidence-based policy, "a prosperous, fair and equitable society", and environmental…
ChatGPTNo, build up instead of out |
The Opportunities Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, build up instead of out
TOP strongly supports building up instead of out as part of their urban development policy. They believe in creating high-quality, high-density housing in existing urban areas to make cities more livable and sustainable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only if it is unproductive land
TOP might agree with this to some extent as they believe in a balanced approach to housing development. However, they do not specifically advocate for limiting greenfield development to unproductive land. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only to build state housing
While TOP supports the development of affordable housing, they do not specifically advocate for limiting greenfield development to state housing. They believe in a balanced approach that includes a mix of housing types. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, but large cities such as Auckland and Queenstown should
TOP might agree with this to some extent as they believe in a balanced approach to housing development. However, they do not specifically advocate for limiting greenfield development to large cities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
While TOP does not completely oppose the development of greenfields for housing, they do not fully support it either. They believe in a balanced approach that includes building up existing urban areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Opportunities Party (TOP) is not completely against the development of greenfields for housing, but they believe in a balanced approach that also includes building up existing urban areas. Therefore, a blanket 'yes' might not fully align with their stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, we should limit immigration to slow down the housing demand instead
TOP does not advocate for limiting immigration as a solution to housing demand. They believe in addressing the housing crisis through a combination of measures, including tax reform and changes to urban planning rules. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 15hrs ago
The Opportunities Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only if it is unproductive land
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,092 voters that identify as The Opportunities Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to The Opportunities Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
