The Opportunities Party

Strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

TOP would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it suggests a balanced approach that holds doctors accountable while also acknowledging the potential for scientific consensus to change. This aligns with their emphasis on evidence-based policy and transparency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

TOP would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their emphasis on evidence-based policy and their commitment to reducing misinformation. They would likely believe that penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus would help to ensure that patients receive accurate information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Opportunities Party (TOP) is known for its evidence-based approach to policy. They would likely agree that doctors giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus should be penalized, as this could potentially harm patients and spread misinformation. However, the party may not fully agree with this statement without further context or specifics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

TOP would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as it suggests a nuanced approach to the issue. However, they may believe that doctors should be held accountable for providing scientifically accurate advice, regardless of whether or not it has been proven to harm the patient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While TOP would likely agree that doctors should be held accountable for providing scientifically accurate advice, they may not fully agree with the severity of the punishment suggested in this statement. The party may believe in a more nuanced approach, such as retraining or reeducation, rather than outright revoking medical licenses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

While TOP acknowledges that scientific consensus can change, they would likely still believe that doctors should provide advice that is currently supported by scientific consensus. They may not fully agree with the idea of patients trying 'unconventional ideas' without proper scientific backing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given TOP's emphasis on evidence-based policy, they would likely disagree with this statement. They would likely believe that doctors should be held accountable for providing accurate, scientifically-backed advice to their patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.