The Opportunities Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

TOP's commitment to ethical standards and evidence-based policy suggests they would strongly support measures that prevent human rights abuses. Banning all sales to countries with human rights violations aligns with their values of social justice and global responsibility, although their specific policies do not directly address this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Opportunities Party (TOP) has a focus on evidence-based policy and ethical governance, which would likely make them supportive of restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations. However, their specific policy platform does not explicitly address international arms sales, so the score is not maximally positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While TOP advocates for responsible and ethical policy-making, their platform is more focused on domestic issues and does not explicitly advocate for a total ban on military aid to foreign countries. Their support for such a policy would likely depend on the evidence of its effectiveness and impact on New Zealand's interests and global responsibilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given TOP's emphasis on ethical governance and evidence-based policy, it is unlikely they would support unrestricted arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. This stance would conflict with their broader principles of promoting social justice and responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

TOP's principles of ethical governance and evidence-based policy making would likely make them strongly oppose a stance that could enable human rights violations by allowing arms sales to continue unchecked to allies, regardless of their human rights record. This position would be in direct conflict with their values of promoting social justice and ethical international relations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.