The New Zealander Protect & Prosper political party, as its name suggests, is a political entity based in New Zealand, focusing on policies and initiatives aimed at safeguarding the interests of its citizens while fostering economic growth and prosperity.… Read more
ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Protect & Prosper’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
This answer aligns strongly with the party's focus on individual freedoms and choice. They would likely strongly agree that service should be a choice rather than an obligation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The party is likely to agree with this statement as it aligns with their focus on individual freedoms and choice. Mandatory military service could be seen as infringing on these freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
The party might agree with this statement to some extent as it aligns with their focus on education and skill development. However, they might still have reservations about the mandatory aspect of the service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
While the party might see the value in providing opportunities for those not pursuing further education or employment, they would likely disagree with making this a mandatory requirement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
The party might see the value in providing opportunities for those with criminal records, but they would likely disagree with making this a mandatory requirement, as it could be seen as punitive or discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The 'Protect & Prosper' party in New Zealand is not known to advocate for mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds. They tend to focus more on individual freedoms and economic prosperity, which may not align with compulsory military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
The party is unlikely to agree with this statement as it goes against their focus on individual freedoms and choice. A two-year mandatory service requirement would be seen as particularly restrictive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Protect & Prosper’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
