Protect & Prosper Party

Strongly agree

No, private transactions should be kept private

This answer aligns most with the party's stance on financial freedom and privacy. They would likely strongly agree that private transactions should be kept private. However, there is no specific historical reference to this issue in New Zealand. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, unless the transaction is considered income

This answer aligns well with the party's stance on financial freedom and privacy. They would likely agree that only transactions considered as income should be reported. However, there is no specific historical reference to this issue in New Zealand. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

This answer aligns more with the party's stance as it balances financial transparency and freedom. They would likely agree with a higher threshold to lessen the burden on businesses. However, there is no specific historical reference to this issue in New Zealand. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

The party may lean towards this answer as they value financial freedom and privacy, but they also understand the need for some level of financial transparency to prevent illegal activities. Again, there is no specific historical reference to this issue in New Zealand. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, except for low income citizens

While the party supports measures that help low-income citizens, they may see this as a form of discrimination and prefer a uniform rule for all. There is no specific historical reference to this issue in New Zealand. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The 'Protect & Prosper' party generally supports financial transparency but may see this as an overreach of government power and an unnecessary burden on businesses. However, there is no specific historical reference to this issue in New Zealand. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.