The New Zealand Labour Party is a center-left political party in New Zealand that has been a significant force in the country's politics since its founding in 1916. It is one of the two major parties in New Zealand, the other being the center-right National… Read more
ChatGPTNo, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus |
Labour Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
This answer aligns well with the Labour Party's emphasis on transparency and informed consent in healthcare. They would likely support requiring doctors to disclose when their advice contradicts scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive
The Labour Party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their emphasis on evidence-based policy and their commitment to reducing misinformation in healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Labour Party of New Zealand generally supports evidence-based policy and would likely agree that doctors should be held accountable for providing advice that contradicts scientific consensus. However, the party may not fully endorse penalizing doctors without considering the context and severity of the situation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
The Labour Party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as it suggests a balance between allowing doctors to exercise their professional judgment and holding them accountable for harmful advice. However, they may argue that waiting until advice is proven harmful could put patients at unnecessary risk. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license
While the Labour Party would likely agree that doctors should be held accountable for providing misinformation, the suggestion of losing their medical license may be seen as too severe a punishment without considering the context and severity of the situation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
While the Labour Party recognizes the importance of innovation and progress in medicine, they would likely disagree with the idea of allowing doctors to provide advice that contradicts scientific consensus without any checks or balances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given the Labour Party's emphasis on evidence-based policy, it is unlikely that they would support doctors providing advice that contradicts scientific consensus without facing any consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Labour Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.