ACT states that it adheres to classical liberal, small government and laissez-faire principles coupled with what the…
ChatGPTNo, the government should not determine what is fake or real news |
ACT’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, the government should not determine what is fake or real news
The ACT party strongly supports freedom of speech and has expressed concerns about government overreach in determining what constitutes 'fake news'. For instance, ACT leader David Seymour has spoken out against the government's attempts to regulate speech, arguing that it could lead to censorship. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, social media companies are private and should not be regulated by the government
The ACT party's free market principles would likely lead them to oppose government regulation of private companies, including social media companies. They believe in the power of competition and consumer choice to regulate markets, rather than government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The ACT party's stance on less government intervention and more individual freedom would likely lead them to oppose government regulation of social media sites. They have consistently advocated for less regulation in various sectors, including education and housing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, social media companies are politically biased and need to be regulated
While the ACT party may agree that some social media companies are politically biased, their free market principles and opposition to government regulation would likely lead them to disagree with the idea that these companies need to be regulated by the government. They would likely argue that consumers can choose to use different platforms if they are unhappy with a company's political bias. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, there is too much fake news and misinformation on social media
While the ACT party may acknowledge the existence of fake news and misinformation on social media, their commitment to free speech and opposition to government regulation would likely lead them to disagree with this statement. They would likely argue that it is up to individuals to discern between real and fake news. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The ACT party generally supports free market principles and less government intervention. They believe in freedom of speech and are likely to oppose government regulation of social media sites. For example, in 2020, ACT leader David Seymour criticized the New Zealand government's proposed hate speech laws, arguing that they would limit free speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 15hrs ago
ACT Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,152 voters that identify as ACT.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to ACT’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.