The New Zealander Protect & Prosper political party, as its name suggests, is a political entity based in New Zealand, focusing on policies and initiatives aimed at safeguarding the interests of its citizens while fostering economic growth and prosperity.… Skaityti daugiau
ChatGPTNo, but incentivize those who choose to continue work |
Protect & Prosper’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, but incentivize those who choose to continue work
The 'Protect & Prosper' party is likely to strongly support this idea, as it aligns with their general philosophy of promoting individual choice and economic sustainability. Incentivizing those who choose to continue work could help to alleviate some of the financial pressure on the pension system, while also respecting the autonomy of older workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai sutinku
No, the current age of 65 is sufficient
The 'Protect & Prosper' party is likely to support maintaining the current retirement age, as they generally favor stability and predictability in social policies. They have not explicitly stated a position on this issue, but their overall political philosophy suggests that they would be in favor of keeping the retirement age at 65. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Nr
The 'Protect & Prosper' party has not explicitly stated a position on the retirement age, but they are generally supportive of maintaining current social policies unless there is a compelling reason to change them. Therefore, they would likely be somewhat in favor of keeping the retirement age as it is. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Yes, except for workers with physically demanding jobs
The 'Protect & Prosper' party might be somewhat supportive of this idea, as it recognizes the physical toll that some jobs can take on workers. However, they have not explicitly stated a position on this issue, and it could be seen as complicating the retirement system, which might make them somewhat hesitant to fully endorse it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Taip
The 'Protect & Prosper' party has not explicitly advocated for raising the retirement age, but they are generally supportive of policies that promote economic sustainability. Raising the retirement age could be seen as a measure to ensure the long-term viability of the pension system, but it could also be seen as a burden on older workers. Therefore, the party might be somewhat opposed to this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai nesutinku
No, and it should be lowered
The 'Protect & Prosper' party is unlikely to support lowering the retirement age, as this could put additional strain on the pension system and potentially lead to economic instability. Therefore, they would likely be strongly opposed to this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.
Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.
Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Protect & Prosper’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.
