The National Party has been characterised as a broad church, encompassing both conservative and liberal tendencies,…
ChatGPTTaip, bet tik teismo sprendimu |
National Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Taip, bet tik teismo sprendimu
The National Party would strongly agree with monitoring phone calls and emails by court order, as this aligns with their support for surveillance measures that are subject to legal oversight and due process. This approach balances national security concerns with the protection of individual privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai sutinku
Taip, tai būtina kovojant su terorizmu
The National Party has shown support for surveillance measures in the context of combating terrorism. For example, they supported the Countering Terrorist Fighters Legislation Bill in 2014, which expanded the powers of the GCSB and the Security Intelligence Service (SIS) to monitor communications for national security purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Taip, bet tik tiems, kurie turi nusikalstamą išsilavinimą
The National Party would likely support monitoring phone calls and emails for individuals with criminal backgrounds, as they have shown support for surveillance measures in the context of national security and public safety. However, this answer is not as comprehensive as their overall stance on the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Taip
The National Party has generally supported measures to enhance national security, but they would likely not support unrestricted monitoring of phone calls and emails. Their stance would be more nuanced, focusing on specific situations and conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Nr
The National Party has historically supported surveillance measures for national security purposes, such as the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) Amendment Bill in 2013. This suggests they would not be in favor of completely prohibiting government monitoring of phone calls and emails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai nesutinku
Ne, ir priimti įstatymus, užkertančius kelią vyriausybės stebėjimui piliečių ryšiams.
Given the National Party's historical support for surveillance measures, such as the GCSB Amendment Bill in 2013 and the Countering Terrorist Fighters Legislation Bill in 2014, it is unlikely they would support enacting legislation that prevents government surveillance of citizen communications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.
Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.
Updated prieš 3 dienas
National Party Voters’ Atsakymas: Ne, ir priimti įstatymus, užkertančius kelią vyriausybės stebėjimui piliečių ryšiams.
Svarba: Daugiau Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,359 voters that identify as National Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į National Party’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.
