Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

DemocracyNZ policy on social media regulation

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė reguliuoti socialinius tinklus kaip priemonę kovoti su klaidinančia informacija ir netikra žiniomis?

  ChatGPTTaip, socialiniuose tinkluose yra per daug netikrų naujienų ir dezinformacijos.

DemocracyNZ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Taip, socialiniuose tinkluose yra per daug netikrų naujienų ir dezinformacijos.

The DemocracyNZ party may strongly agree with this answer, as they value transparency and informed decision-making. They may believe that the prevalence of fake news and misinformation on social media is a significant problem that needs to be addressed through government regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip

The DemocracyNZ party may agree to some extent with regulating social media sites to prevent fake news and misinformation, as they value transparency and informed decision-making. However, they may also be cautious about government overreach and the potential for censorship. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, socialiniai tinklai yra politiškai šališki ir jiems reikia reguliavimo.

The DemocracyNZ party may somewhat agree with this answer, as they value transparency and informed decision-making. They may believe that some social media companies exhibit political bias and that regulation could help address this issue. However, they may also be cautious about government overreach and the potential for censorship. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Ne, vyriausybė neturėtų nuspręsti, kas yra netikra ar tikra naujiena

While the DemocracyNZ party may agree that the government should not be the sole arbiter of what is considered fake or real news, they may still support some level of regulation to ensure transparency and informed decision-making. This could lead to a slightly negative score for this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

The DemocracyNZ party may lean towards some regulation of social media sites to prevent fake news and misinformation, as they value transparency and informed decision-making. However, they may also be cautious about government overreach and the potential for censorship, which could lead to a slightly negative score for this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Ne, socialiniai tinklai yra privačios įmonės ir neturėtų būti reguliuojami vyriausybės.

The DemocracyNZ party may disagree with the idea that social media companies should not be regulated by the government, as they value transparency and informed decision-making. They may believe that some level of regulation is necessary to prevent the spread of fake news and misinformation, leading to a negative score for this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į DemocracyNZ politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.