Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Reply

 @9HK9YD6 answered…1yr1Y

Reelected by the trumps and Johnson support give a UK and america support by legs seats legend former UK prime minister Boris Johnson hoping stands up unions and step down increase program

 @9DWKW35answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, they should only be allowed to stand in 2 consecutive elections before having to stand down allowing for fresh ideas and moving with the times

 @9DVGLL3Green answered…2yrs2Y

No, but there should be age restrictions with retirement benefits for fairer representation of young people

 @9DQXFPVNationalanswered…2yrs2Y

No but maybe only for prime ministers (two terms). Also increase the terms to four years. Three years is too short to get anything done.

 @9DQCX3Danswered…2yrs2Y

 @9DPH5P6answered…2yrs2Y

Not necessarily, a good member of parliament/prime minister might be the best choice for the country, however the individuals most likely to do everything they can to remain in power probably aren't going to be making the best choices for the country but more what is best for them personally.

 @9FFSX48ACTanswered…2yrs2Y

No. and remove any payments after leaving parliament. (No one else is continuously paid after leaving a job.

 @9FFR8HSNationalanswered…2yrs2Y

There should be less parlimentary seats, and higher incomes to attract people with real world experience instead of 'professional politicians'.

 @9FCFHRFanswered…2yrs2Y

 @9F86C5Danswered…2yrs2Y

No, but everyone that goes into politics should have 10 years working in the public sector

 @9F5B8QYNationalanswered…2yrs2Y

No but there should be age limits. Nobody who could be over 70 during the coming term is eligible to stand for election

 @9FPG44Ranswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, term limits for parties should be increased to 5 years for the first term and 3 years for successive terms.therefore members can stay in position over this duration, provided they meet the performance criteria of the public and party in power.

 @9FPBVTQNationalanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes to Term limits. Say 6 terms max. AND a requirement that 90% of all Politicians actually have a relevant CV that proves competence in Managing people, budgets, etc... and prudent decision making and success at something

 @9FPBKZLGreenanswered…2yrs2Y

No, they should be able to stay as long as they are the right person for the job.

 @9FGS9TWOpportunitiesanswered…2yrs2Y

No, it is infeasible to limit how much experience the people running the country have. However, their benefits and salaries should be decreased, and if caught partaking in bribery or lobbying they should be banned from reelection

 @9DMSH5Canswered…2yrs2Y

No, but their salary and benefits should decrease and not be exorbitant. Money should not be a motivation for those positions.

 @9DKR2Z6Labouranswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and should be shortened if politicians or candidates have reached an excessively advanced age.

 @9D4TSBVanswered…2yrs2Y

I agree that elections can be used as term limiters, but I also think 20 years should be the maximum time in Parliament, and that their pensions should be reduced and not increased for service beyond 12 years.

 @9BD9XGJanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only for the Prime Minister (at three terms). All salaries and benefits should be reduced.

 @96CP7PQanswered…2yrs2Y

increase can the more parliaments under footages with is said can bring up their mandate right rides without the premises is premises under maori and european under nato's union teams can bring more the life times is the 50 years under treatment with mid middles is there aren't more decrease can bring human harm just forgotten irish just decrease cna with cbs news and newshubs reason can bring more arguments🥰

 @95KSND5answered…3yrs3Y

 @945CVFTanswered…3yrs3Y

If they’re good at what they do then they should be allowed to go for as long as they want but there should be the option for the public to vote them out if they feel the MP is under preforming

 @9CZZGC4Nationalanswered…2yrs2Y

No, but reduce the salary and retirement packages which add cost to the tax payers wiht no benefit.

 @9CT6DVXanswered…2yrs2Y

No, but I don’t agree with List members of Parliament. Representation should be a personal accountability to a constituency.

 @9C9WRKQNationalanswered…2yrs2Y

Only if they are not performing as expected otherwise election term is a term

 @9C2K3PSanswered…2yrs2Y

No, but there should be a three strikes system or other which allows those who've proven corrupt or ineffective from running again.

 @9BTXGPTanswered…2yrs2Y

No, but decrease salary & retirement benefits and invest in health or education

 @9BC37RYanswered…2yrs2Y

No, but they should only be able to be re-elected if they delivered on political promises

 @9B8PBMDanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes but in conjunction with a term extension. Expecting delivery outside BAU in a 3 year term is ridiculous and it's costing a fortune. We need to extend the term to 4 years.

 @martinnesanswered…3yrs3Y

increase the governments benefits was not could km keep on mentalist worse can great by law or order is hateness harmfulness watching in the door or offline windows keep our hoods online and gap its goes 😭 dopes and copies with damages

 @8H7C4LRanswered…4yrs4Y

 @8DWNDL4answered…5yrs5Y

I believe we have too many politicians and we should decrease the number of politicians we have.

 @8CJH7QYanswered…5yrs5Y

No but parties should ensure their members are working for their regions, too often once elected in MP's dissapear from public

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...