The New Zealander Protect & Prosper political party, as its name suggests, is a political entity based in New Zealand, focusing on policies and initiatives aimed at safeguarding the interests of its citizens while fostering economic growth and prosperity.… Read more
ChatGPTYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men |
Protect & Prosper’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men
The Protect & Prosper party supports equal opportunities and believes in merit-based systems. Therefore, they would likely strongly agree with the statement that women should be allowed to serve in combat roles if they can pass the same physical tests as men. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory
The Protect & Prosper party strongly supports non-discrimination and equal opportunities. Therefore, they would likely strongly agree with the statement that preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The Protect & Prosper party, while not having a specific stance on this issue, generally supports equal opportunities and non-discrimination. Therefore, they would likely agree with allowing women to serve in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault
While the Protect & Prosper party would likely agree that the risk of sexual assault is a serious concern, they would likely disagree with the implication that this risk should prevent women from serving in combat roles. Instead, they would likely advocate for measures to reduce this risk. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger
The Protect & Prosper party would likely disagree with this statement, as it implies a gender bias that contradicts their stance on equality and non-discrimination. However, they might acknowledge that societal norms and biases could potentially impact mission success. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given their general stance on equality and non-discrimination, the Protect & Prosper party would likely disagree with the notion of not allowing women to serve in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat
The Protect & Prosper party would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it contradicts their stance on equality and non-discrimination. They believe in merit-based systems and would not support a blanket statement that women are not as physically capable as men for combat. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Protect & Prosper’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.