Should politicians over 75 years of age have required to pass a mental competency test?

Yes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test

No

Yes, and ban anyone over the age of 75 from running for office

No, I would prefer term limits instead

No, this discriminates against older politicians

No, mental competency is too subjective

No, our government needs experienced leaders

Yes, but there should be a strict age limit of nobody over 70 in politics

No, but those declared medically incompetent in the past should be retested before being allowed to run.

Mental competency should be for ALL politicians

Flags ups mental nurse are Ireland and chime of Europe unions help or hurt staff officer with dignity and big improvement skills with French high alert warning signs emergency investigation

Yes, only if they have been noted of having difficulties within the larger public eye while doing their duty

Quit already

Every politician should have to

Politicians should be forced to retire by 75 years.

No this discriminates against older politicians and mental competency is too subjective

No. I would rather see an age cap of say 80, for entering parliament. People that are (statistically) not going to significantly feel the effects of policy decisions shouldn't be making them.

There should be an age limit of 60.

No, People elected them into office, if age was a concern they wouldn't have voted for these people

No, but there should be a ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office

No, but an age cap of 72 should be implemented

Yes, and cap salaries and benefits, and ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office

No one over 70 should be in parliament

Yes but they should still be accepted if they pass as they will have more experience

If you are running for prime minister, then yes at any age.

Imagine a scenario where a highly skilled leader is forced to retire due to age. How would that affect society's progress?

How can younger generations benefit from or be disadvantaged by mandatory retirement ages in leadership positions?

If you had the power, what criteria would you set for someone to remain in a professional role as they get older?

In what ways might mandatory retirement ages impact the diversity and representation in politics or judiciary?

How does the concept of 'age equals wisdom' fit into the debate on mandatory retirements for certain professions?

What are the pros and cons of having age limits for high-responsibility roles, like politicians or judges?

How would you feel if your favorite public leader had to retire at a certain age, regardless of their abilities?

Can you share a time when you noticed someone's abilities didn't match with societal expectations due to their age?

What alternative measures could be taken to ensure that professionals remain competent in their roles without setting age limits?

Is there an age at which people should no longer make significant societal decisions? Why or why not?