Should the United States provide military supplies and funding to Ukraine?

No, Ukraine should rely on their own resources to defend themselves

No, we cannot afford to give economic resources right now

No, we cannot afford to give military resources right now

Yes, but decrease the current amount of resources we are providing

We should provide an equal amount of support to both sides not favouring while maintaining good diplomatic relations with russia

No. All propaganda aside: NATO *was* supposed to disband, and the creep up to the Russian border was always going to cause a war (remember the Cuban Missile Crisis). The Ukraine war and Gaza have started the World on a new trajectory, splitting it in 2. We now face more terrorism (eco and religious), and more war. NZ would be suicidally stupid to get involved in any significant way, these issues have been brewing for a while and are not caused by what most western media claim.

ecommerce of the unkriane currently by spending with track gadgets with video and surveillance by unlawful things

No, we should not be involved in this conflict. Instead invest that funding into protecting our own country and people if we were to encounter a war future

NATO alliance should send troops to actively defend the Ukraine and accept Ukraine into NATO

Absolutely not! This is all a political ruse the leader of the country is corrupt. Ukraine is used as a political laundering playground like Cuba was a long time ago.

Yes, but no. We should but do not have the ability to do so as our military is too weak.

Yes, as long as Germany Will Win World War 3

New Zealand should fix its own country before aiding others

Yes if we can afford it.

Yes, if there are some spare weapons, but generally speaking, New Zealand needs to strengthen its own military first before it strengthens the military of other countries.

Yes keep doing what they are doing

Yes, but we shouldn’t use tax money

Yea but no because we chould lose nzders and yea because its helping a good contrey and if we ever need help they can help us

Hard question for a pacifist. My sympathies are with the Ukraine and I recognise that they need international support both military and humanitarian if they are not to lose a conflict which has ramifications for the rest of the world.

No, NZ has supported Ukraine up to now. Ukraine needs to do more to end the conflict and broker peace instead of going around the world on a power hungry trip collecting an arsenal of high powered weapons. If continued this will lead to another world war

I am comfortable with the current NZ contribution

Yes, but be careful on how much we can afford to fund

No. NZ should remain neutral on the world platform.

Lets put our own country first For once

maintain current level of support

Ukraine is not the only war

Yes, but not weapons of mass destruction or weapons associated with war crimes such as depleted uranium

Yes, and direct military assistance

Not for war, only to help the people

just a bit.

We should do the absolute bare minimum where required by NATO or the United Kingdom. I like not being hated by Russia / other scary countries

Yes, but only provide humanitarian aid to both Ukraine and Russia.

Increase and human resources and mental healthline with opinion by legal documents inc

No but our entire refugee quota should go to skilled Ukrainians

Can providing financial support to a country in conflict make citizens feel a sense of global unity, or does it create more division?

Eh yeah, be careful and accountability if the money is going towards good cause to help Ukraine not bombs but for help.

If you were an international decision-maker, how would you weigh the controversies of taking sides in a foreign war or conflict?

Accept Ukrainian refugees only.

What would lead you to support or oppose your country sending financial aid to another during a time of war?

How do you think global leaders should balance helping refugees with managing their own country's needs?

Do you think military aid in conflicts is a moral obligation, or should countries prioritize their own internal issues?

If your community had to make sacrifices to support another country in need, what would be acceptable, and what wouldn't?

What role should social media play in shaping public opinion about global conflicts, and how do you determine what sources to trust?

How do you think foreign conflicts can impact local communities, even if they occur thousands of miles away?

Can you imagine how it would feel if your home was destroyed by conflict—how might that change your view of international relationships?

What would be your primary concern if you were displaced from your home due to war—safety, family, or something else?

The repairs stepping stones make my bones wider allowed Ukrainian should only defined themselves at is selfies as said government feedback admins