Should the government fund the World Health Organization?

Funding should go to New Zealand health care to prioritise the people here and national issues first.

New Zealand should fund its own Health Organisation

No, the who has shown itself to have a political agenda.

not fund but donate

Home the homeless first

Yes, but only if necessary

Yes, but they should be individually benchmarked

Yes, as long as they stick with science and evidence based medicine and remove support for pseudo medical views such as acupuncture, homeopathy, chiropractic, etc.

Yes, but it shouldn’t outweigh the amount we spend nationally and regionally.

WHO have no business being in NZ’s business and we should not be giving them money. WHO and the WEF are not good for the people. Dangerous.

Yes if nz benefits from the investment and can support global impacts

Yes, and create an international initiative to enrich the health of people internationally

Yes only if China and Russia leave.

What we are required to only we should be funding more into our own communities

On paper they sound good, but in reality they aren't.

use excuse by united nations is depart reason there aren't biggest hilden by uplifting weights sunny shaines

keep funding because then developing countries will have support

World healthline and about is government alone and leting excuse more pain and Europe union meetings inc

Decision is decrease by bank tax accountant by using government alone with special needs budget inc

Yes, but when we reduce our deficit.

I am satisfied with current funds

No. It has been compromised by the Chinese communist party.

Increase and NATO+ stable which steams power unkriane with russian and UK defence forces air and feed of army attack unkriane target well boys and french defence forces airs and feed of good army attack unkriane and united state president Donald trump's thrubs stories modes give support by new Zealand and Australia with under nath us Japan choose not give china gas prices and transport

Yes. But we need to know where the money is being spent.

Yes but proportional to population

How accountable do you think global health organizations should be to the public or to the countries that fund them?

How do you think global health organizations, like the WHO, can affect your personal life and health choices?

Do you think you would feel safer in a health emergency with an international health organization taking charge, or do you trust local governments more?

If you could decide what health problem the WHO focused on next, what issue would you choose and why?

The repairs stepping stones make my bones wider should world health organization stops unions meeting natos as said government feedback admins

How would you balance the role of private donations versus government funding in global health organizations like the WHO?

Do you think more attention should be given to diseases in wealthier countries or those that affect mainly developing nations?

In what ways could cutting funding to global health organizations, like the WHO, impact future outbreaks of illnesses like COVID-19?

How important do you believe it is for countries to work together to fight global pandemics, rather than each nation acting alone?

What do you think sounds more valuable—spending money on global health initiatives or addressing local health problems first?

Should wealthy nations contribute more to global health efforts to support poorer countries, or should every country be responsible for their own health system?