Try the political quiz
+

Reply

 @BD6CVWXNew Zealand Firstanswered…2wks2W

Yes, only for large businesses that have a significant impact on the environment.

 @BD3D95Nanswered…3wks3W

I would have said only to control exports of water, but with the amount of water AI facilities use, and one proposed for Southland , Have to say Yes

 @BCT7S9Panswered…4wks4W

question isn't well formed.

A bottler shipping water pays tax.
A business that uses water supplied by a council or similar pays usually for a water meter.

But should those who profit from fresh water supply pay more for it? thats a case by cae question

 @BCM3TVNACTanswered…1mo1MO

If a business uses significant quantities of water, they should be charged particularly if they are participating in the export market.

 @BC4LVVCanswered…2mos2MO

If lo cal users are charge, the businesses should be too. Otherwise water supply is the responsibility of the local council and paid for by normal rates.

 @BB5YS4WNew Zealand Firstanswered…3mos3MO

No, there should be more focus on land management and the cleaning of waterways separate from business water usage.

 @9F6FFPGGreenanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes but maybe not heaps for farmers. But also do use the money to clean local waterways and give back to the environment.

 @9F65XRVLabouranswered…3yrs3Y

 @9F64D96answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only if they aren't harming aquatic creatures or damaging an underwater habitat

 @9F62H6MACTanswered…3yrs3Y

No, This would put some smaller businessess out of business eg water blasting

 @9F5S342Greenanswered…3yrs3Y

Big couprate businesses yes. Small business no untill they earn a certain amount annually

 @9DWVVW2answered…3yrs3Y

 @9DVKCCTACTanswered…3yrs3Y

 @9DT22WZanswered…3yrs3Y

 @9DQWQV8answered…3yrs3Y

Businesses using significantly more than the majority should probably pay some form of levy.

 @9DNBJ6Lanswered…3yrs3Y

 @9DCCQHCOpportunitiesanswered…3yrs3Y

Under the Resource Management Act the resource consent applicant is set a take limit. Cut the consent period to 10 years.

 @9D9GDJGanswered…3yrs3Y

if the Business is NOT a NZ Owned Business - then YES, If it is a NZ Owned Business then NO.

 @9D8Z8GBOpportunitiesanswered…3yrs3Y

If they degrade the quality of the water or are taking significantly above the average for their industry

 @9D5H56RLabouranswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, if they use over a certain limit and/or are shipping resources overseas.

 @9D4TSBVanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, especially if they are shipping water overseas, or irrigating crops that never used to grow in that region, lowering the water table for all the other farmers and water users, freshwater life in the region. Less so if they are a farmer who is using water responsibly.

 @9D4CC5Tanswered…3yrs3Y

 @9G5F66Wanswered…3yrs3Y

I agree with both the waterway cleanup and shipping overseas. I think it depends on what the water usage is for and the size of the company using that water.

 @9FPG44Ranswered…3yrs3Y

Yes and use the funds to clean up local waterways and improve public water infrastructure.

 @9FMF6C3ACTanswered…3yrs3Y

Council water meters should be compulsory for business, and the business should pays local government not central government.

 @9FL6BC8Greenanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and use the funds to clean up local waterways. With a higher rate for water being shipped overseas

 @9FK46GPDemocracyNZanswered…3yrs3Y

If they are drawing water from aquifers and then bottling to sell overseas or back to us then yes

 @9FJY7Z5answered…3yrs3Y

 @9FJS6XJLabouranswered…3yrs3Y

Manufacturing & Sellers of export or local bottled water should be taxed

 @9FFR22Nanswered…3yrs3Y

 @9FFNQFXanswered…3yrs3Y

I don’t taxing actually creates resolutions. Usually someone will get a budget and no real plan will be in place. Things will constantly change which means it’s void money. It will be spent into oblivion on things that make zero real world impact. But I definitely think we should be doing more to work with our environment instead of against it. Humans are dirty.

 @9FFJWZWNationalanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes if the company is using over a certain amount. Unfair for small businesses while big businesses earn more

 @9FDWTKSanswered…3yrs3Y

Water is essential for life and a working economy therefore it is a rite not a privilege

 @9FDW3RNanswered…3yrs3Y

I partially support this however am concerned at what tax would be imposed and where the cost pass on would lead to e.g. Inflation

 @9FDRWQNanswered…3yrs3Y

 @9FDRMSKanswered…3yrs3Y

 @9FDLC68Labouranswered…3yrs3Y

 @9FCG9PGLabouranswered…3yrs3Y

Businesses that are water intensive should yes. (Eg, water bottlers (especially overseas companies) car washers, pools)

 @9FCFHRFanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes - proportionate to the amount of water they use that they are not paying for in another way.

 @9FB9Q8HGreenanswered…3yrs3Y

Is there not a better way to encourage careful use of water? Meters for high users like horticulture, eg.

 @9FB8J84Nationalanswered…3yrs3Y

Depends on how much water is used and the business's environmental and economic impacts on the local community.

 @9FB3S6BLabouranswered…3yrs3Y

Depends on how the water is used... how does it harm the environment etc.

 @9F9DLFZanswered…3yrs3Y

 @9F9CSXPLabourfrom California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9F8DQRVTe Pāti Māorianswered…3yrs3Y

yes but only big rich businesses because some small businesses/people/workers can't afford the taxes they all ready have to pay

 @9F86C5Danswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but these taxes need to be used to protect and clean up waterways in that region

 @9F7L7SNLabouranswered…3yrs3Y

Yes and No, either only depending on the amount they actually use and for what

 @9F5MGSBNationalanswered…3yrs3Y

Only if they sell water as a product eg: water bottles, water tankers etc.

 @9F4N9DXanswered…3yrs3Y

Only if it is used in or a part of their business and they are making money out of it

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...