86% Yes |
14% No |
82% Yes |
9% No |
4% Yes, except road spending should go to public transport instead |
3% No, we should limit immigration to slow down the housing demand instead |
3% No, private developers should pay a major portion of the cost |
See how support for each position on “Housing Infrastructure” has changed over time for 163k New Zealand voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Housing Infrastructure” has changed over time for 163k New Zealand voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from New Zealand users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@6HC49WD3yrs3Y
The owners of land that receive a capital gain should be taxed to help cover the cost of infrastructure. The government should cover the bare minimum of infrastructure costs to keep housing affordable, with increased investment based on the most efficient use of that capital, near transport hubs.
@6HB7DNY3yrs3Y
While more houses need to be built, this will not solve the housing crisis entirely. All assets should be taxed, to scare off investors and property moguls who are trying to make a quick buck off the less fortunate, who will most likely be renting their whole lives due to an extortionate market.
@6GZNLSY3yrs3Y
No, we should stop urban sprawl and increase density in already populated areas.
@8DL2CFC4yrs4Y
It is important, but the budget should be increased slightly
@9HK9YD6 5mos5MO
The privacy of living independently over checked formed by legend former UK prime minister Boris Johnson and former US president Donald Trump talk with white House dramatic
@8CHZHTP4yrs4Y
no, because I think this is now pretty good and have nature, please don't turn it into China
Explore other topics that are important to New Zealand voters.